Solfeggio Harmonics

 I never understood the Solfeggio.  They don’t make any kind of playable musical scale – they don’t seem to be harmonics of each other, you can’t create a melody out of them and they seem to have no relation to any other measured resonance. 

But with some prompting from friends I read through Len Horowitz’ Book of 528.  The main thing I learned from this is that Dr. Joseph Puleo had found the Solfeggio numbers in the Biblical Old Testament Book of Numbers.  

Well, it seems that in ancient times, the Minute was divided into 18 Helek, and the Second was not used until much later, perhaps the 16th Century. So, if the Solfeggio refer to vibrations, they’re going to be vibrations per Helek, not vibrations per Second.  

The Solfeggio number 528, for example may be a sacred number – but to hear it, we need to convert it from vibrations per Helek to vibrations per Second.

There are 3.3333-recurring seconds per Helek, so 528 / 3.3333 seconds = an octave of 316.8 Hz.

Now, 31,680 Miles is the perimeter around the earth, as well as the circumference around the Earth going through the middle of the Moon if the Moon was resting on the Earth. The following illustration is from John Michell’s book, Sacred Geometry – How The World Is Made.

Interestingly:

  • 5040 miles (the radius from the centre of the Earth to the centre of the Moon) = 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 7
  • And 7920 miles, (the diameter of the Earth) = 8 x 9 x 10 x 11

These number are all multiples of 720:

  • 31680 (perimeter of Earth) / 720 = 44
  • 2160 (diameter of Moon) / 720 = 3
  • 5040 (radius of Earth with Moon) / 720 = 7
  • 7920 (diameter of Earth) / 720 = 11 (and musically, 11 is an octave of 22)

So, all the harmonic magic of the ratio of size of the Earth and Moon, and Pi, can be understood as simple ratios.

You will recall from school that 22/7 is an approximation of Pi – so Pi (3.141 etc etc),the ratio from which the circumference of circles can be calculated, is simply the ratio of the Earth diameter (7920 miles) to the Earth-Moon radius (5040 miles)

(7920 x 2) / 5040 = 3.142857 142857 recurring = geometric Pi

  • Interesting things about the number 720:
    • Our B-flat frequency is 7.2 vibrations per second
    • 216 vibrations per second (which is an octave of A = 432 Hz), is the same thing as 720 vibrations per Helek
      • (720 / 3.3333 seconds = 216)
      • 2160 miles is the diameter of the Moon
      • 2160 vibrations per Helek is 648 Hz, an octave of the Solfeggio E at 324 Hz

Going back to the Mi Solfeggio tone of 528 vibrations per Helek (528 / 3.3333 seconds = 316.8 Hz):

  • 316.8 Hz is the 11th harmonic of the B-flat frequency described on our home-page at 7.2 Hz which we know has an electro-magnetic interaction with sound, and is a sub-harmonic of the daily, gravity-driven rotation of the Earth.
  • 7.2 Hz x 11 = 79.2 Hz
  • 79.2 Hz x 4 = 316.8 Hz

The combination of a base frequency and its 11 harmonic has been used to selectively destroy cancer cells in the living body.  

Let’s consider whether all the Solfeggio frequencies might actually be encoded as vibrations per Helek, and are 11th harmonics of some underlying frequencies:

So, as vibrations per Helek instead of vibrations per second, the Solfeggio 528 (“Mi”) translates precisely as the 11th harmonic of our B-flat – as 316.8 Hz

And also, the Solfeggio 396 (“Ut”) translates precisely as the 11th harmonic of the Earth F frequency of 345.6 Hz, (475.2 Hz).

What are the chances of this!!?? The two frequencies I had happened to find in 2016 on a tone-generator app on my iPhone as being “non-beating” nodes against the background hum of Creation, happen to have been encoded in the Biblical Book of Numbers as their 11th harmonic in vibrations per Helek.

If you feel some power in 528 vibrations per Second, try instead listening to 528 vibrations per Helek, which is (528 / 3.3333 Seconds) = 316.8 Hz.

To celebrate – here’s a proper “528” track, where “528” is not vibrations per Second, but vibrations per Helek. And is therefore actually 316.8 Hz. The track itself is by my good friend Craig Pruess, who has adopted these frequencies for his latest work. And I provided some slow 11th harmonic frequencies for your general health – hopefully!

While the 528 and 396 numbers are precisely the 11th harmonics of the two frequencies we described on the home-pager, it’s also interesting in the chart above that the Solfeggio number 741 (“Sol”) is very close to the 11th harmonic of our E frequency of 323.63 Hz (323.3).

And also, “Re” translates from 417 vibrations per Helek to 363.9 vibrations per second (close to our F-sharp frequency, 364.088 Hz).

Now, the other numbers: Fa (639) and La (852) don’t yield anything from our harmonic scale that I can tell as 11th harmonics. But as basic frequencies they are close to one of our G frequencies (383.4 vs 384 Hz), and one of our C frequencies (256 vs 255.6). This here’s a track which, as I recall, uses all these frequencies – and there is a certain sweetness to this tuning:

The frequencies I’m using are a Bb myxolidian scale like this:

B-flat 230.4 Hz
B 485.452
C 256
C# 273.066
D 288
Eb 307.2
E 323.63
F 345.6
F# 364.09
G 384
Ab 409.6
A 432

In summary, as far as the Solfeggio goes:

  • Everyone is listening to them wrong !
  • When converted from vibrations per ancient Helek to vibrations per Second they reflect harmonics of the daily rotation of the Earth
  • Somehow these frequencies are encoded in the Bible – if that is where Dr. Joseph Puleo and Len Horowitz found the Solfeggio numbers. And even if they just made the Solfeggio numbers up – it’s an amazing coincidence that converted from vibrations per Helek (3.3333-recurring seconds per Helek) to vibrations per Second, they are precisely 11th harmonics of the “still point” Earth frequencies I had discovered in a Johannesburg hotel room!

Below, we’ve also explored Beats Per Minute derived from these frequencies – for musicians looking to build tracks which connect their beats and rhythms to the resonance of our Planet. When the musical bass-line is resonating at a harmonic of your beat, then the music and the beat become one – and that’s incredibly powerful.

21 thoughts on “Solfeggio Harmonics

  1. Rife Royal was working on frequencies to cure cancer in the 1930’s his work is documented and with the success rate you have quoted in your findings.

  2. 1) It is my understanding that the Solfeggio Frequencies are harmonics of the Schumann resonance. I divided them by 8 and they are very close to multiples of 8 with SR=7.83-8 Hz. (“…have no relation to any other measured resonance.”)
    2) Gregorian chants are monophonic which means sung in unison.(“…a third note created by the unison singing or playing of two other notes.”)
    3) The origin is believed to be Sanskrit per my reading. (“…as Gregorian chants were supposedly their origin.”)
    4) The difference between Solfeggio Frequencies is 111 Hz three times, otherwise 102 and 21. Did you account for this not being a pattern? The Hz of 110 – 111 is the “sacred” frequency used in archaeoacoustics. My theory is that the intentional sustain of the echo in the temple/cathedral creates the “difference notes” of 111, except that it’s not always 111. Can you figure this out if you think it useful?

    1. Hi and thanks. I haven’t come across 111 hz in my resonance exploration except as a difference-tone from the solfeggio. It is the 37th harmonic of 3 hz.

      And 3 hz is a sub-octave of G at 384 hz (derived as the 5th harmonic of Eb as 0.3 hz (0.3 hz x 5 = 1.5 hz x 2 x 2 etc = 384 hz)).

      37 is a prime number but the 37th harmonic is going to be very faint, and G as a frequency for me is one of the “upper”, derived frequencies rather than being foundational like E-flat which is a harmonic of the Earth’s daily rotation.

      I don’t hold much stock in the Schumann resonance – it apparently being a measurable range of frequencies caused by friction between the atmosphere and the rotating earth. To me, it’s a red herring just because there are three frequencies i’m sure of and it doesn’t seem to correspond to them: B-flat at 7.2 hz and F at 5.4 and 10.8 hz (because i experienced the interactive stillness these frequencies had against an unheard background vibration). And E-flat at 9.6 or 0.3 hz (because it’s a third harmonic below that B-flat and corresponds to the time it takes the Earth to rotate 1/72nd of a degree and is also corresponds to the length of time known by the babylonians as a “helek” (3.3333 recurring of our modern seconds)).

      The closest point of reference with the Schumann resonance is at 8 hz which, if we make our C 256 hz, (as derived as the 5th harmonic of A-flat at 0.1 hz), gives 0.5 hz which is a low octave of 8 hz.

      The thing with the the Schumann is that it’s variable: it’s not connected to the geometry which drives the rotation of our planet. The rate of Earth’s rotation doesn’t vary by 20 percent from day to day, but the Schumann does. It’s a symptom of the earth’s rotation, a side effect, but not a “driver” as I see it.

      All that said, the number 1111111 recurring did show up when i looked for the root of all frequencies here https://harmonicsofnature.com/2022/02/27/music-based-on-the-3-and-5/. So, i think 111 is a sacred number and from the table in the link above you can see that 0.0111111 recurring Hz is a very low F-sharp.
      And when you take the 5th harmonic of that you can essentially multiply it by 10, which yields 0.11111 recurring and would be a B-flat.
      And another 5th harmonic of that would be 1.1111 recurring hz, a D.
      11.1111 recurring Hz would be F-sharp again.
      And 111.1111 recurring Hz would be a B-flat again. But this doesn’t align with my B-flat which is 115.2 hz at that octave. So the difference is 4.08888 recurring hz (111.111 minus 115.2 hz), which i’ve no doubt is itself comprised of harmonic components (https://harmonicsofnature.com/cycleoffifths/)

      So, 111 hz may well be sacred, but if it is it seems to be coming as a harmonic of an extremely low frequency F-sharp. It’s also possible that as a sacred number it refers to vibrations per helek or degrees of the earth’s rotation as explored in the first link above.

  3. Im wondering if you did that experiment again now if it would be the same? What is telling you this 5.4 and 10.8 is a natural phenomena and not a created sonic wave undetectable to the human ear for possibly the control of human consciousness? if you went into a complete far far place away from human civilization do you think you would still get that reading? or if you travel to a new destination. How about local power interference? electrical or mechanical? I think this test needs multiple readings to remove potential variables to solidify your conclusion. I for one really want to know hahaha I know we are a seeded race and that ET civilizations exist here on earth and across the universe and it’s obvious through ancient cultures that they understood frequency and vibration accurately. If the theory about the moon being a projector of the 3d matrix on earth you could also be intercepting the inner workings of this. frequency and vibration governing everything in creation these theories that may seem far out must be considered. ET races and earth presence is undeniable nowadays. We literally have spliced DNA which is proof of unatural evolution and genetic manipulation for the creation of the human being. We are open about our knowledge, relations and history with these races. It’s just a lot to base off of with one reading one time from your house. We know 440 equal temperament was implemented after cymatic research in ww2 with the nazi’s which is obviously destructive so you can’t rule out an undetectable reading to be created for intention. we also know hitler claimed he was influenced by an ET civilization to build a super soldier race to eventually eradicate the reptilian presence on earth… were like babies in the universe so we have to bounce a theory and test it across many theories to rule things out to come to conclusions, especially when dealing with the something at the root of all creation, frequency, energy and vibration.

    1. Hi JP – I have tried it in several countries, indoors and outdoors. However I only experienced it with that version of the Tuning app and those bluetooth headphones. That said, the web-site is dedicated to the fact that these frequencies turn out to have a direct relationship to the length of the day on the Earth (https://harmonicsofnature.com/a-day-is-g/ ) and also, as numbers (54, 72, 108) these are numbers that occur often in Hindu Vedas, in Revelations, and other sources. such as John Michell – where they turn up as distances for the size of the earth, moon and sun. I’ll do a write-up of that soon. And as sound-waves, seem to be the frequencies being generated with the distances provided in ancient temples such as Gobekli Tepe and the way that Tibetan’s moved rocks https://harmonicsofnature.com/2019/07/07/using-sound-to-move-rocks/. So, I believe there is something in all this, which I’ve stumbled across. I don’t know about the moon being a projector and all that – but there must be some trick to space and time in order for quantum entanglement to allow two photons at different ends of the universe to interact with each other.

      1. Very cool!

        I love your research regardless of human unknowns. My pianos been tuned to 432 Pythagorean for a couple years I’m going to try your tuning out and make my next native flute in your Bb scale.

        Cheers

      2. Thanks for the reply. Your research is awesome! I’ve been looking for info around these topics for a long time and you’ve presented so much very well. I’ve watched everything Gaia has on sound, internet and its multiple theories and research on sound healing, different beliefs on what the chakra frequencies are, etc. I make Native American flutes and play various instruments. Funny my uncle told me he tunes to A in his band but the orchestra he plays in tunes to Bb. He’s trombone so he tunes anything. I’m going to make a flute in Bb to your scale and tune my piano to it as well. Been 432 pythag for a couple years. It may tune me up just right I’ll let you know if I have cracked levitation with it 🙂 cheers

      3. The book of 528 presents some interesting conclusions around 528hz and the solfeggios. The math in relation to the planets and such is beyond my comprehension. Just throwing it your way in case you still have the itch and run out of others research to entertain against yours.

  4. YES! I literally screen shot your pages because I’m afraid of losing the info haha I see a a little book in the near future!

    I have explored this after our chat and found the same. It’s possible 528 tuning which is actually 444 tuning showed such a significant increase in oxytocin and decrease in cortisol with the clinical study against 440 because they didn’t compare the one 528hz frequency alone they used piano music tuned in 444 equal playing 444 and its octaves which could be the real reason being the 444.6 hz of the 741 solfeggio.

    1. Thanks JP – I may ask for a copy of those screen-shots, as I deleted the old comparison of “difference-notes”. In the world of Heleks and Helekim, the differences between the notes seemed to be less of a pattern than the alignment of the notes to the 11th harmonic. But I might want to revisit the difference notes thing.

  5. Hello guys, I read a lot, but the brainstorm is intense.
    I am a fellow musician who likes to think and search deep down things, but I dont wanna break my head over it.
    So I have played many years on guitar in 432hz (For A) finding music to be soothing and comforting, and when I was in harmony with myself I tend to put guitar away cause I was already balanced.
    Iam already playing in 444hz for a few years, and I have noticed few things that I wanna share, cause I see some real passionates in here.
    So greetings guys! 🙂
    In 444hz I have found music to be peeking with joy, playfullness,
    Also I noted it was more natural to play faster than in 432hz.
    I also felt Iam more in tune with the nature, but not the peace like in 432 but with joy, and day energy.
    But I must say that sometimes when I feel down, and I take 444hz to play there is a dissonance between my energy and its energy so untill the playing puts me up I feel like the intensity of its playfullness not corresponds with my sadness and it feels a little to be frustrated with. (As long as Iam not putting a lot of attention to feelings it changes, but untill you are there it is not pleasant)
    Also when I do sing to those frequencies same my own compositions I noticed that in 432 it is more a story telling with emotions, and space for it.
    And in 444 it is hard to get my word out of mouth cause the tunning is already very energising.
    So unless you have a lot of people to shout out with joy it is not neccesery to sing along :P.
    Ofcourse those are my subjective opinions and experiences.
    So since both number are in a universe and there are many proofs of it.
    Does it allow us to play guitar harmoniously with the universe or not entirely?
    In this case I mean the gaps between frets.
    Guitar was made with compromise, and I have a quiete good guitar, maybe not very expensive but I think it is very good quality.
    When playing 444 on 12th fret I have a decimal difference of octave.
    Also on the G string I have quite decimal difference on 3rd fret.
    I don’t know if its due to guitar’s condition, it has few years, or is it due to the standarisation of the gaps between frets.
    It would be nice to have some guitar salesman who is doing guitars with “True Temparement” distance but according to the solfeggio/432/444 cause as you know guys it is all connected though.
    I mean I like to play some progressions f. ex. 1st 5th 7th and 12th, 2nd and 3rd are also in tune, but I wonder if I would be finding more nice progressions when the temperament would be fixed.
    What do you think?
    Does it matter so much those few decimal points or not necessary?
    Do you have any experiences with guitars?
    Iam open for discussion but let’s talk about your experiences not mathematical discovering 🙂
    See ya!

    1. Hi Flip – well, I’m biased, but I don’t feel a strong vibration at 528 Hz or 444 Hz. But that may be that I know that 528 Hz is the 11th harmonic of a G at 384 Hz, and that G is a 5th harmonic of our E-flat frequency. And all that is good, but I believe, as explained above, that “528” is actually 316.8 Hz which is the 11th harmonic of our B-flat frequency. So, while 528 Hz is a resonant frequency, it’s sort of on the outer branches of the harmonic tree, rather than being related directly to the “trunk” of the tree. My recommendation is to listen to this binaural track I prepared and see how that makes you feel. You can also install a tone generator app on your phone and explore 316.8 or divide that by 2 to give you lower octaves, and see how you feel about that. https://on.soundcloud.com/moKpS

      1. An interesting point of view.
        The lower vibration the closer to the origin but does that make it stronger than higher frequencies?
        I doubt so, ofcourse we speak about point of view.
        In my opinion the higher Sound the stronger frequency is.
        I mean it is faster and pitch is simply higher.
        Same with normal music if you sing something louder or is it just singing in many voices in choir sopran (higher) is always more uplifting than lower for expample bass.
        But bass maybe more calming.
        So im therms of feeling being calmed and more relaxed you may have right.
        But in therms of raising your vibration not necessary.
        I see it both ways one that are lowered pitch are more tranqualiazers peacefulmakers while the highers are more about getting impulse being inspired being impulsed by joy, passion and so on.
        Both are needed.
        It is a good point though that you made about the trunk.
        Cause through your science it is easy to lost the thoughts (to many numbers)
        So it is good that you pointed that Something comes out of something.
        Beside of that when I look at it right now it is obvious cause higher numbers are later in creation than the previous numbers.
        But i didnt see it then that way.
        I must say that I admire the effort that you have made on this webside.
        ….
        I have an idea.
        If you listen to higher freq music your vibration melts with it gets absorbed into the whirlwind of its vibration, till next wave.
        If you listen to lower frequencies it is same your vibration is lower, so your density is bigger/denser.
        I think that people who are always in the action and they never do stop in life they may need lower vibration music therapy while people in stagnacy who tend to depress they need more higher frequency music.
        It maybe obvious cause it is logic, but I have an eureka moment right now and I want to share it.
        Cause after playing 444for years i got some difficulties in balancing my life.
        You know it is good to have a solution to normalise the amplitude of life ups and Downs.
        Thank you a lot sir!

      2. Hi Filip. It has occurred to me that perhaps reality manifests through the aethers first from the higher frequencies downwards, rather than the way musical instruments propagate harmonics from the lower to the higher. But i do think that the idea of “raise your vibration” may be a trap: the natural frequencies are lower than 440 hz equal temperament, but on the other hand maybe we need to go from a high E to a low F, for example.

    2. Filip – you’ve probably found this page also https://harmonicsofnature.com/just-intonation-instrument-design/. Yes, I do believe the True Temperament necks are an improvement – if you tune in standard tuning, meaning EADGBE, or down-tune or up-tune a semi-tone or a tone. I’ve down-tuned the entire tuning to a D and that puts all the main major-chord shapes in the right place: e.g. the C shape gives B-flat major, and the G-shape gives F-major chords. etc. It is a compromise harmonically – but it is very good. Some say it’s just Equal Temperament, but it is in fact a temperament designed to favour certain chord shapes and positions – so you can work with it to bring the main notes exactly in-tune. When I play along with the keyboard that is precisely tuned using Apple Logic Pro for each note, then I really can’t tell much of a difference.

      However, if you play other tunings, like open-tunings, the True Temperament doesn’t help – because it is designed to fix the intervals between the strings in standard tuning.

      In which case, you can use this site (https://www.ekips.org/tools/guitar/fretfind2d/ ) to design your own guitar fretboard for an open tuning. Plastic cable-ties seems to be a popular way to explore different fret placements, but it gets slightly trick when you have frets that are needed only for one string.

Leave a Reply